Tag Archives: speaking out

I am not Obsolete

As Posted http://errorandangermanagement.com/:

I don’t believe that civilization is on a course for some inevitable liberal societal bliss.  Often as I read newspapers, text books, or hear the words of politicians I am struck that there seems to be this belief that we are all headed towards a liberal utopia, and all those of us who love liberty can do is drag our heels and whine as the procession of progress slowly drags us into the future.  This is why the comments of Senator Harry Reid bothers me so much.  I quote from the Christian Science Moniter, “Instead of joining us on the right side of history, all the Republicans can come up with is, ’slow down, stop everything, let’s start over.’ If you think you’ve heard these same excuses before, you’re right,” Reid said. “When this country belatedly recognized the wrongs of slavery, there were those who dug in their heels and said ’slow down, it’s too early, things aren’t bad enough.’”

“When this body was on the verge of guaranteeing equal civil rights to everyone regardless of the color of their skin, some senators resorted to the same filibuster threats that we hear today,” he added.

And so in one stroke of broad sweeping rhetoric I as an opponent of his health care reform end up 1) on the wrong side of history 2) just  like those who supported Jim Crow and Slavery.  Wow!  What revisionist history have we forgotten that Abraham Lincoln the man who freed slaves was not a member of Mr. Reid’s party.  For that matter is it really fair to let one party take all the credit for abolishing slavery and ending Jim Crow.

Bothersome as his original comments were his attempt as clarification was even worse.  This time from Politics Daily,

“At pivotal points in American history, the tactics of distortion, delay have certainly been present,” Reid said in the Capitol Tuesday. “They’ve been used to stop progress. That’s what we’re talking about here. That’s what’s happening here. It’s very clear. That’s the point I made — no more, no less.”

In his first statement he essentially says the idea of not having government meddling with heath care is as obsolete as slavery, now in his clarification he brings out the word progress. Why do we allow Harry Reid to declare so matter of factly that big government socialism is “Progress.”  He said it those of us who favor limited government are according to Mr Reid using “tactics of distortion” to slow progress.

Still more dismaying is the republican response, most wanted to clarify that democrats not republicans held up the freeing of slaves and the ending of segregation.  But really who cares, I am not that interested in vilifying the other party, there are people on both sides of the isle who make mistakes.  Other targeted Harry Reid, saying he was “beneath the dignity of the majority leader” or going over the top.  But still no one really called him on his attempt at painting his position as the inevitable future of the county.  We may in fact do Mr. Reid many favors by not talking about what kind of Progress he envisions, most Americans probably don’t want what he would give them.

I am actually very offended to be told by an elected official that all I am doing is procrastinating the bright dawning day of the future.  Stopping Progress. I love progress, we need to get better at solving our problems and we all want a bright future.  It is time for is to stand up, challenge this idea that limited government is the wrong side of history.  Show people how progressive limited government and capitalism.  When Sen Reid tells you to get out of the way of progress it is time to inform him we have a different idea of the future than he does.

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Focus on issues more than miscues

As posted on ErrorandAngermanagement:

Recently we posted a piece entitled “double Standard”  I would like to take a different view on the same set of events.  In the book “Game Change” we can read of the opinion of one Harry Reid (D-Nev)

“Reid would claim that he was steadfastly neutral in the 2008 race; that he never chose sides between Barack (Obama) and Hillary (Clinton); that all he did was tell Obama that “he could be president,” that “the stars could align for him.” But at the time, in truth, his encouragement of Obama was unequivocal. He was wowed by Obama’s oratorical gifts and believed that the country was ready to embrace a black presidential candidate, especially one such as Obama — a “light-skinned” African-American “with no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one,” as he later put it privately.”

Now I am as dismayed by the political game and the hypocrisy of the NAACP, the Rev Al Sharpton and the congressional black caucus as you may be.  We all know if those same comments were made by a person whose politics were seen as less in line with the objectives of each person/organization they would be tossing him out on his ear right now.  I still feel that the fact remains that the comment by itself probably doesn’t require more then an apology which Sen. Reid has issued.

The politics of Gotcha-ism (as Sen. Ensign also of Nev. has called it) really needs to stop.  The reality is that I am not convinced this poor choice of words meets a high enough standard for me to call Sen. Reid’s character into question.  For all of us who thought Sen. Lott was treated unfairly we need to remember two wrongs do need equal a right.

IN many ways I am sad to see so many ranking republicans running to the nearest microphone to complain about Sen. Reid’s choice of words, when his politics cause me much greater concern.  How about asking for his resignation over the huge national debt, or his poor domestic policy, those seem to me to be bigger issues than his characterization of our president.  In all of this whirlwind we have lost sight of the bigger news, SEN. REID WAS ALREADY LOSING TO HIS MORE CONSERVATIVE CHALLANGERS BASED ON HIS CONSTITUANCYS DISAPROVAL OF HIS POLICY (polling at about 40% against all three possible challengers).  In other words we were winning based on our message, and now we are no longer even talking about conservative values.  I firmly believe that we are better off keeping our political arguments based in issues and the character of the individual.  I am not sure I see these recent comments as much an issue of character as one of expediency and gotch-ism

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized